Every product on the internet has a video. Most of them walk you through how it works, what it does, why you should trust it. They answer every question except the one that actually drives behaviour: does this make me feel something?
Brands pour budget into explaining features while the internet drowns in content that looks right but lands nowhere. The gap isn't production quality. It's emotional honesty.
You spent $8K on a perfect explainer. You got 40,000 views and twelve signups. This is for what comes next.
80%
of B2B buyers — emotion shapes the decision, not features (Gartner 2025)
92%
of consumers globally prefer ads that feel like a story over ads that explain a product
10×
more likely to be shared — video ads that evoke strong emotion vs standard video content
+46%
higher ad recall when content uses memory-coded emotional elements (ARF 2026)
xim.codes is a media house for short-format emotional storytelling. We use AI tools, mix-media, clipping, and found footage — assembled with craft and emotional intent. Nothing over 90 seconds. Every second earning its place.
We don't make ads. We don't make explainers. We make the content that makes someone feel something — then wonder where it came from.
In 2013, Slack published a blog post called We Don't Sell Saddles Here. It was about the feeling of the future, not the feature list. It travelled further than any ad they ever ran. Every founder who's read it knows exactly what we mean. xim.codes is that — in video, in 45 seconds, for the founders who can't write it themselves.
Format 01 — 15 to 30 seconds
The Clip
One emotion. No explanation. A fragment of a feeling that stops the scroll and makes a stranger say "yes, that." Built for Reels, Shorts, TikTok — made to travel without a caption.
Format 02 — 30 to 60 seconds
The Teaser
Something withheld. No product shown, no feature listed — just enough world-building to make the question feel urgent. Makes people want something to exist before they've seen it.
Format 03 — 60 to 90 seconds
The Short Story
A complete emotional arc. Beginning, middle, feeling — told through mix-media, clipping, AI-assisted imagery, and real sound. Not a film. Not an ad. The gap between both.
What should this person feel when it ends? Not what should they know. Not what should they click. The feeling is the brief. Everything else — the cuts, the sound, the pacing — is in service of landing that one thing with precision.
And the content always tells the truth. If it travels, the feeling is real and the product has a reason to exist. If it doesn't, that's the most valuable thing we can tell you before you spend your runway finding out the hard way.
Every clip, teaser, or short story is built around one of these. We find which one is true for the product — and make something that proves it exists in the world.
Recognition
"That's exactly me."
Seeing your unspoken experience reflected back. Not a demographic — you, specifically.
Relief
"Finally."
The exhale. We show the before so the after lands as release, not just convenience.
Belonging
"People like me use this."
Not aspirational in a celebrity way. Recognisable in a mirror way.
Nostalgia
"I remember when—"
Memory-coded visuals and sound. Makes something new feel like it always should have existed.
Curiosity
"Wait — what is this?"
Something deliberately withheld. The question made urgent. No product shown.
Pride
"I made the right call."
Quiet validation. Content that makes the buyer feel smart, not sold to.
Delight
"I didn't expect that."
The small surprise. More human than expected. The most shareable emotion, and the rarest.
Urgency
"I need this now."
Not scarcity. The ache of realising you've been missing something too long.
That's the most useful thing we can tell a brand. We treat content performance as honest feedback — not a metric, but a signal about whether the product is solving the right emotional problem. No reach means no resonance. And that's information worth having before you spend your runway.
Founders have always had three ways to test whether their idea has a market before they build: surveys, landing pages, smoke tests. All three measure the same thing — whether someone will click or sign up. None of them measure whether anyone actually feels the problem the product is solving.
Clicks lie. Waitlists lie. A comment section at 2am from strangers who've never met the founder, tagging their friends and asking "why does this not exist yet" — that doesn't lie. That's emotional product-market fit. And it's the only kind that predicts whether people will stay, not just sign up.
Step 01 — The brief
Identify the feeling, not the feature
We don't need to know what the product does. We need to know what it's supposed to make someone feel. Relief from a specific frustration. The pride of a specific kind of competence. The belonging of a specific kind of person. That feeling is the brief. The product stays invisible.
Step 02 — The clip or teaser
Make content about the feeling. Show nothing else.
A 30–60 second clip or teaser built entirely around the emotional state the product is designed to create. No product shown. No company name. No problem statement. Just the feeling — rendered in mix-media, sound, and image — released into the world with no attribution. A competitor who sees it learns nothing. The audience who feels it tells you everything.
Step 03 — The signal
Watch what the comments say, not what the metrics show
Views are noise. Saves and shares are signal. But the real data is in the language people use when they respond. Do strangers tag other strangers? Do people say "this is me"? Does anyone ask "where do I get this?" or "why doesn't this exist?" That comment section is your first honest market research. It cost a fraction of a focus group. It's faster than a survey. And it's more honest than both.
Step 04 — The traction
Arrive at the investor meeting with emotional proof
Before the pitch deck. Before the waitlist. Before a single line of code. A founder shows up with a piece of content, 40,000 views, 800 saves, and a comment section full of people saying "I need this" — for a product nobody has seen yet. That's a new form of traction. And it's one a competitor cannot copy, because they don't know what the product is.
Right now, pre-seed founders show up with a deck, a prototype, and maybe a waitlist. What they can't show is whether anyone feels the problem. A clip that traveled — with its view count, its comment section, its save rate — is the first form of traction that proves emotional demand without proving technical execution. It answers the question investors can't ask directly: do real people, who have no incentive to be kind, actually feel this?
That's not a marketing metric. That's market evidence. And it predates the product entirely.
The global content marketing market is $575B in 2025, growing to $1.8T by 2034. The US market alone sits at $181B. The creator economy is $161B this year and projected to hit $480B by 2027.
Inside all of that, short-format video ad spend is heading to $145B by 2028. The volume of content being made has never been higher. The proportion of it that makes anyone feel anything has never been lower.
$181B
US content market 2025
North America holds ~45% of global share
$480B
Creator economy by 2027
Growing 28%+ YoY. Short-format at the centre.
1,200%
More shares — social video vs text and images combined
Emotional short-form video earns reach that no media buy can replicate
74%
TikTok impressions non-paid
Feeling earns its own reach. The algorithm rewards emotional completion.
Reason 01
AI flooded the internet with content that looks right but feels empty
US creator marketing budgets rose 171% year-over-year in 2025 — but brands are pulling back from AI-generated content as audiences disengage. Human-crafted emotional clips and short stories are the rarest — and most valuable — format right now.
Reason 02
2025 was the first year UGC revenue surpassed professionally produced media
A structural shift. Creator-led short-format storytelling is outperforming every legacy format. The window to define what emotional clips and teasers mean for brands is open right now.
Reason 03
Founders build in public — but nobody feels in public
Metrics, milestones, product updates — all public. Nobody is making teasers about the feeling their product creates before launch. That gap is the opportunity.
Reason 04
AI tools make mix-media short-format production fast and lean
Sora, Runway, CapCut, ElevenLabs. The production gap is closed. What remains is taste and emotional intelligence — knowing which feeling to build a clip around. That's the skill. That's us.
The big agencies are built for broadcast budgets and six-month timelines. The production studios are built to fulfill a brief, not challenge it. The narrative studios write words and hand them back. Nobody makes the clip.
xim.codes makes the clip. And the teaser. And the short story. With a sensibility — an aesthetic sense of what a feeling looks like — that belongs to us, not to a client's brand guidelines.
Wieden+Kennedy
Creative agency
$50M+ minimum. Built for broadcast. Needs a celebrity. Six months minimum. Won't make a clip for a startup.
Droga5 / BBDO
Global ad network
Campaign-first thinking. Can't move at startup speed. Doesn't do teasers or emotional short stories for early-stage products.
Vidico / Explainify
SaaS video studios
Built to explain features. Great at walkthroughs. Wouldn't know which feeling to invoke or how to build a teaser that withholds the product entirely.
meaning.company
Narrative strategy
Words only. Upstream strategy. Hands back a manifesto and a positioning document. Never makes the clip, the teaser, the short story.
@pmarca_alt X.com
the best marketing for a new product isn't explaining it. it's making someone feel the absence of it. every great launch I've seen did this first.
r/marketing Reddit
we spent 3 months on a perfect explainer. our competitor spent 2 weeks on a 45-second clip that made people cry a little. they won. we learned.
@contentcreator.sg Instagram
the clips that actually travel aren't the ones that tell you what something is. they're the ones that make you feel what it's like to need it.
xim.codes becomes the reference point for short-format emotional content — the place brands, startups, and founders use to find out what they actually mean to people. Not through surveys or focus groups. Through clips and teasers and short stories that either travel or don't.
That either make a stranger say "this is exactly it" — or tell you something true about why it didn't. The media house that proved feeling is the most defensible moat in a world of infinite content.
Most clients don't come to us because they believe in emotional storytelling. They come because the last thing they made didn't work. Cost optimisation is the door in. Feeling is what makes them stay. The first clip we make together costs a fraction of what the explainer cost. And if it travels — it travels without a media buy.
If you're a video editor who's bored of explainers. A creator who wants to make clips that mean something. A motion designer who thinks feeling is a craft problem. Someone who believes 30 seconds — if they're the right 30 seconds — can make a stranger stop, feel, and share.
We're building a collective, not a company. You bring the craft. We bring the emotional brief. Together we make content that people remember without knowing why.
@shortfilmmaker X.com
the best short-format content being made right now isn't coming from agencies. it's coming from people who care about the feeling more than the brief. looking for that kind of work.
r/videoediting Reddit
anyone else feel like the clips that actually move you are almost never from a brand's official account? it's always some small studio or solo creator who just... got it right. I want to make that kind of thing.
@clipmaker.kl Instagram
been editing for 4 years. never felt like the work meant anything until I started making clips about feelings instead of features. the shares are different. the comments are different. everything is different.
@foundermode X.com
hired a video agency. spent $8k. got a gorgeous explainer that perfectly describes a product nobody feels the need for. lesson learned.
r/startups Reddit
our launch video has 40k views and 12 signups. did everything right — problem, solution, demo, CTA. the issue isn't the video. the issue is nobody cares about the problem yet.
@brandstrategist Instagram
the brands winning right now aren't explaining their product. they're making you feel the absence of it. there's a huge difference.
@uxwriter_lea X.com
I can tell the exact moment a piece of content was made by a brief vs made by a feeling. one makes you understand. the other makes you share.